Some point in the misty, forgotten time of 2010, I discovered a Wikipedia page
1977 in Film, and thought it would be a fun adventure to watch them all. There are some very good movies released that year, and some very bad ones. I'm ONLY watching US films - although there are a few British/US films that make things slightly confusing. In fact, I'm starting with one of those!
Jabberwocky was Terry Gilliam's first solo film after Monty Python, and it shows. The film is packed to the gills with a lot of set-ups that are very reminiscent of Monty Python bits that, unfortunately, lack the payoff/punchlines of Monty Python bits. It's always interesting to compare the solo work of members of an artistic collective to that collective work. Wearing my wild speculation hat, it seems like Gilliam (and perhaps Palin) were the gents on MP who set up the situations that Cleese and Idle took to absurd (and hilarious) conclusions. Lots and lots of set-ups, very little solid execution. When there is execution to the set-up, it's often literal execution, with someone dying in a gruesome and ironic fashion. Gilliam obviously carries a dark humor with him, and death is the ultimate punchline in his work. After making a film that would unfortunately always be compared (unfavorably) to
Monty Python and the Holy Grail, Gilliam found his stride. But here, he's still trying to find a voice that isn't waiting for a punchline.
However, Mr. Gilliam's eye to setting is often astonishing, and an ironic reason for his (largely) commercial failure as a director. His medieval settings are filthy, crumbling, filled with human excrement, and filled with human living. No matter how 'gritty' a Hollywood medieval film gets, only in a Terry Gilliam film will you find a lake-dweller hanging his arse out the window of his houseboat to defecate, with arse on camera. He's happy to frame a shot where the important action to the plot is background and pushed to the side in favor of focusing on a castle drudge robotically sweeping up ashes from the royal fireplace. All of his films show this same dedication to de-mythologizing fantastic settings; it's what I consider his greatest strength as a director of satire.
The effects are limited and Mr. Gilliam makes fantastic use of hinting at the monster and not showing us until the climax. The Jabberwocky is pure practical effects - a man in a suit, a puppeteer working the head from off-camera, and playing with angles (years before Peter Jackson got all the credit for forced perspective) and camera speed to create a cockatrician behemoth. To younger kids weaned on Avatar and Star Wars prequels, the beast may not impress, but to a generation that had their minds blown by the REAL Star Wars, this beastie feels almost as good as Lucas' aliens.
The movie maintains a brisk pace throughout, telling a rather simple fairy tale: "poor peasant rises to astonishing heights through luck and pluck" with a Gilliam-esque tweak. Dennis Cooper has a few modern ideas (efficiency, 'improving the business') that clash with his mostly medieval mindset and entirely medieval surroundings. Through a series of mishaps and British unwillingness to argue, the disgraced cooper's son becomes a squire to the King's Champion and then becomes the Hero of the Kingdom, married to Deborah Fallender's idealistic princess. This last is 'funny' because all Dennis wanted was to become just successful enough to marry the fishmonger's fat, brutish daughter. It's a typical "Everyone loses, no matter how successful they are" Gilliam ending.
Sign It's 1977: Full-on Princess nipples in a PG film
Conclusion: A journeyman effort on Gilliam's part, 2.5 stars out of five.